oxford happiness questionnaire reliability and validity

Examining the Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire

The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ) has gained popularity as a multidimensional measurement instrument for assessing happiness and well-being. However, its reliability and validity have been questioned by researchers. To address this issue, Hills and Argyle developed the OHQ in 2002 to provide an accessible equivalent measure of the Oxford Happiness Inventory (OHI). A recent study aimed to examine the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the OHQ alongside the Eysenckian dimensional model of personality.

The study involved a sample of 131 undergraduate students who completed the OHQ and the abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The results showed good internal consistency reliability, with an alpha coefficient of 0.92. Moreover, the test-retest method indicated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha range of 0.838 to 0.950.

Furthermore, the study found positive associations between extraversion and happiness, as measured by the OHQ. This finding suggests that the instrument has good construct validity in terms of measuring personality traits related to happiness.

The findings of this study support the use of the OHQ as a reliable and valid measure of happiness and well-being. However, future research is needed to further investigate its psychometric properties across different populations and cultures. The development of a multidimensional measurement instrument like the OHQ can provide valuable insights into the complex construct of happiness, which has important implications for our understanding of human behavior and mental health.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the reliability and validity of the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire, making it a useful tool for researchers and practitioners interested in measuring happiness and well-being.

Oxford happiness questionnaire reliability and validity